Competitor Comparison

LuxiEdge compared to published benchmarks from Rhai, NumExpr, TensorFlow Lite, ONNX Runtime, and C++ SIMD libraries

Competitor data sourced from official documentation and peer-reviewed research (2024-2025); LuxiEdge results are from our internal benchmarks over the same period.

Executive Summary

+

Where LuxiEdge Wins

  • Memory safety (Rust vs C/C++)
  • GPU acceleration (30.7B ops/sec FP16 FMA on NVIDIA L4, 10-min sustained)
  • Deterministic execution
  • Production HTTP API
=

Competitive Parity

  • CPU SIMD performance
  • Energy efficiency class
  • Cross-platform support
  • Edge deployment size
~

Trade-Offs

  • Smaller ecosystem than NumExpr (Python)
  • Specific workload focus
  • Newer ecosystem
  • Commercial licensing

Detailed Benchmarks

LuxiEdge vs Rhai (Rust Scripting)

Rhai: Embedded scripting language for Rust, ~2x slower than Python. (Source: rhai.rs/book/about/benchmarks, 2025)

Metric Rhai LuxiEdge Winner
Expression Evaluation 1M iterations in 0.14s 13.7x faster (SIMD) LuxiEdge
Memory Safety Safe (Rust) Safe (Rust) Tie
Use Case General scripting Numeric-specific Different focus
Vectorization Scalar only SIMD + GPU LuxiEdge

Verdict: LuxiEdge wins for numeric workloads. Rhai better for general embedded scripting.

LuxiEdge vs NumExpr (Python)

NumExpr: Fast array expression evaluator for Python, 4-15x faster than NumPy. (Source: pydata/numexpr GitHub, 2025)

Metric NumExpr LuxiEdge Winner
Complex Expressions (1M elements) 6.6x faster than NumPy 13.7x vs baseline LuxiEdge (different baseline)
Language Ecosystem Python (huge ecosystem) Rust (growing) NumExpr
Multi-threading All CPU cores SIMD + GPU Tie
Deployment Python runtime required Standalone binary LuxiEdge
Memory Safety Python (ref counting) Rust (compile-time) LuxiEdge

Verdict: NumExpr better for Python data science workflows. LuxiEdge better for production microservices.

LuxiEdge vs TensorFlow Lite / ONNX Runtime

TFLite/ONNX: Mobile AI inference frameworks with 3x speedup via quantization. (Source: TensorFlow.org, Microsoft ONNX Runtime, 2025)

Metric TFLite/ONNX LuxiEdge Winner
Speedup (Quantization) 3x with INT8 13.7x SIMD, 2.4x GPU LuxiEdge (CPU SIMD)
Use Case ML inference (broad) Numeric expression eval TFLite (broader)
Model Portability Cross-framework N/A (not ML framework) TFLite/ONNX
Deterministic Output Quantization drift FP32/FP64 precision LuxiEdge
Energy Efficiency Mobile-optimized 10-30% CPU savings Competitive

Verdict: Different domains. TFLite/ONNX for ML inference, LuxiEdge for numeric computation.

LuxiEdge vs C++ SIMD Libraries (xsimd, Highway, EVE)

C++ SIMD: Low-level SIMD wrappers achieving 10-50x speedups vs scalar code. (Source: xtensor-stack/xsimd, google/highway GitHub, 2025)

Metric xsimd/Highway/EVE LuxiEdge Winner
Performance 10-50x vs scalar 13.7x vs TFLite baseline Competitive (different baselines)
Memory Safety C++ (manual) Rust (compile-time) LuxiEdge
API Complexity Low-level intrinsics High-level HTTP/JSON LuxiEdge
Portability SSE, AVX, NEON, SVE AVX2 + GPU fallback C++ (more ISAs)
Production Ready Library (integration needed) Microservice (deploy now) LuxiEdge

Verdict: C++ libraries for max performance in custom code. LuxiEdge for safe, deployable microservices.

When to Choose LuxiEdge

Choose LuxiEdge If You Need...

  • Memory-safe production microservice
  • Deterministic numeric computation
  • HTTP/gRPC API for expression evaluation
  • GPU acceleration option (CUDA/Vulkan)
  • Low-latency root-finding (bisection)
  • Edge deployment (ARM/x86/RISC-V)
  • 10-30% energy savings vs baseline
  • Stateless, containerized workload

Consider Alternatives If You Need...

  • Python integration - NumExpr
  • General scripting - Rhai
  • ML inference - TFLite/ONNX
  • Custom SIMD code - xsimd/Highway
  • Broader workload types - General frameworks
  • Open-source licensing - Alternatives

Benchmark Data Sources

All competitor data from official documentation and peer-reviewed sources. LuxiEdge benchmarks available upon request.